Shoals Technologies Group, LLC v. ITC
International Trade Commission
Holding
The Federal Circuit granted Shoals's motion to voluntarily withdraw its appeal from the ITC's Investigation No. 337-TA-1365 and dismissed the appeal, over the intervenors' opposition. Costs were awarded to the intervenors, Voltage.
Why It Matters
A voluntary dismissal ends the appeal without any ruling on the merits, and the court still taxed costs against the withdrawing appellant despite the ITC's non-opposition. The order gives no guidance on any patent issue.
Full Summary
Key Points
- Shoals Technologies Group, LLC appealed from the ITC in Investigation No. 337-TA-1365; Voltage LLC and Ningbo Voltage Smart Production Co. intervened.
- Shoals moved to voluntarily withdraw the appeal. The motion stated that the ITC did not oppose it, while Voltage opposed it.
- The panel (Chen, Linn, and Cunningham, Circuit Judges) granted the motion per curiam and dismissed the appeal.
- Costs were awarded to Voltage. The order states no reasoning and does not identify the patents or issues involved.
How this summary was made: Drafted with AI from the court's opinion or order; before publishing, code checked that the quotation and the citations it gives appear in that document. Editorial policy
New to District court litigation? Start with PTAB vs. District Court: Where to Challenge a Patent’s Validity
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 22, 2026In Re Fleet Connect Solutions LLC
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 21, 2026Chowdhury v. Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 20, 2026JBS Hair Inc. v. ITC
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 16, 2026Micron Technology, Inc. v. Netlist, Inc.
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 15, 2026Pictiva Displays International Ltd. v. Samsung Display Co., Ltd.