PerdiemCo LLC v. NexTraq LLC

PerdiemCo LLC v. NexTraq LLC The Federal Circuit affirmed the Northern District of Georgia's judgment in favor of NexTraq LLC against PerdiemCo LLC, summarily under Fed. Cir. R. 36 and without opinion. The judgment does not state the issues or reasoning. The result is a clear win for the appellee, NexTraq, but the Rule 36 affirmance gives no guidance on the issues below, so readers must consult the district court record to learn what was decided. Affirmed. PerdiemCo LLC, plaintiff, appealed from the Northern District of Georgia (No. 1:23-cv-00193-MHC, Judge Cohen) in its case against NexTraq LLC. A panel of Judges Lourie, Bryson, and Chen heard oral argument and affirmed per curiam under Fed. Cir. R. 36. Result: the district court's judgment stands and the appeal by PerdiemCo fails. The judgment does not identify the patents, claims, issues, or reasoning, so the basis for the ruling cannot be determined from this document. The disposition is nonprecedential and, as a Rule 36 judgment, carries no analysis to rely on. Rule 36 affirmance non-precedential