Back to Blog
CAFC-PTOSeptember 11, 2026·25-1596·Affirmed.

WIPQTUS, INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Holding

The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB without opinion under Federal Circuit Rule 36. The judgment provides no reasoning or issue-specific holding beyond affirmance.

Why It Matters

Because this is a nonprecedential Rule 36 affirmance, it resolves the parties’ appeal but provides no new guidance on the underlying PTAB issues.

Full Summary

WIPQTUS, INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB without opinion under Federal Circuit Rule 36. The judgment provides no reasoning or issue-specific holding beyond affirmance. Because this is a nonprecedential Rule 36 affirmance, it resolves the parties’ appeal but provides no new guidance on the underlying PTAB issues. Affirmed. The appeal came from the PTAB in IPR2024-00023. The Federal Circuit issued a per curiam Rule 36 judgment. The extracted judgment does not identify the challenged patent claims, technology, prior art grounds, or issues on appeal. The court affirmed the PTAB’s decision without a written opinion. The disposition is expressly nonprecedential. Rule 36 affirmance non-precedential Rule 36 affirmance non-precedential Rule 36 affirmance non-precedential

Key Points

  • The appeal came from the PTAB in IPR2024-00023.
  • The Federal Circuit issued a per curiam Rule 36 judgment.
  • The extracted judgment does not identify the challenged patent claims, technology, prior art grounds, or issues on appeal.
  • The court affirmed the PTAB’s decision without a written opinion.
  • The disposition is expressly nonprecedential.
Rule 36 affirmancenon-precedential

More on this topic