Back to Blog
CAFC-DCTSeptember 15, 2026·26-1527·Affirmed.

ABC IP LLC v. PEAK TACTICAL LLC

District Court

Holding

The Federal Circuit affirmed the District of Wyoming under Federal Circuit Rule 36. The court issued no written opinion, so the basis for affirmance is not stated.

Why It Matters

Because this is a nonprecedential Rule 36 affirmance with no reasoning, it confirms the result below but provides no guidance on the underlying patent issues.

Full Summary

ABC IP LLC v. PEAK TACTICAL LLC [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] The Federal Circuit affirmed the District of Wyoming under Federal Circuit Rule 36. The court issued no written opinion, so the basis for affirmance is not stated. Because this is a nonprecedential Rule 36 affirmance with no reasoning, it confirms the result below but provides no guidance on the underlying patent issues. Affirmed. The Federal Circuit entered a per curiam Rule 36 judgment affirming the District of Wyoming. The panel was Judges Lourie, Linn, and Chen. The extracted judgment does not identify the claims, patents, asserted defenses, or district court ruling being reviewed. No substantive reasoning was provided, and the disposition is nonprecedential. Rule 36 affirmance non-precedential infringement Rule 36 affirmance non-precedential infringement Rule 36 affirmance non-precedential

Key Points

  • The Federal Circuit entered a per curiam Rule 36 judgment affirming the District of Wyoming.
  • The panel was Judges Lourie, Linn, and Chen.
  • The extracted judgment does not identify the claims, patents, asserted defenses, or district court ruling being reviewed.
  • No substantive reasoning was provided, and the disposition is nonprecedential.
Rule 36 affirmancenon-precedentialinfringement

More on this topic