Flypsi, Inc. v. Google LLC

Flypsi, Inc. v. Google LLC The Federal Circuit affirmed, under Federal Circuit Rule 36, the PTAB decisions in five consolidated inter partes reviews (IPR2023-00357 through -00361), so the Board's decisions stand. The judgment gives no reasoning. The Rule 36 judgment leaves the Board's decisions in all five IPRs in place without explanation, so it offers no guidance on the merits and no precedent on the underlying issues. Affirmed. Flypsi, Inc. (dba Flyp) appealed five PTAB inter partes review decisions (IPR2023-00357, -00358, -00359, -00360, -00361); Google LLC is the appellee. The appeals were consolidated under Nos. 2025-1010, -1011, -1012, -1020 and -1030. Held: a panel of Judges Reyna, Mayer and Hughes affirmed per curiam under Fed. Cir. R. 36 after oral argument, so the Board's decisions in all five IPRs remain in effect. The judgment contains no opinion, so the issues raised on appeal, the patents at issue, and the Board's rationale are not stated in the document. The disposition is designated nonprecedential. Rule 36 affirmance non-precedential