PerDiemCo LLC v. NexTraq LLC
District Court
Holding
The Federal Circuit affirmed, under Fed. Cir. R. 36, the Northern District of Georgia's decision on appeal by PerDiemCo against NexTraq, so PerDiemCo lost the appeal. The judgment gives no opinion, so the grounds and the subject of the ruling below are not stated.
Why It Matters
The result is a clear loss for the appellant, PerDiemCo, but a Rule 36 judgment gives no reasoning and no guidance on the underlying issues, so readers who need the substance must look to the district court record, which is not included here.
Full Summary
Key Points
- PerDiemCo LLC, plaintiff-appellant, appealed from the Northern District of Georgia (No. 1:23-cv-03722-MHC, Judge Cohen) in its case against NexTraq LLC, defendant-appellee.
- The panel (Lourie, Bryson, and Chen) heard argument and entered judgment of AFFIRMED under Fed. Cir. R. 36 on May 15, 2026, so the district court's ruling stands.
- The judgment does not identify the patents, claims, technology, or the district court ruling or issues decided, so the legal basis for affirmance cannot be determined from this document.
- The disposition is nonprecedential and offers no reasoning to apply to other cases.
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 8, 2026In re Gonthier
- Fed. Cir. · Sept. 15, 2026ABC IP LLC v. PEAK TACTICAL LLC
- Fed. Cir. · Sept. 15, 2026DODOTS Licensing Solutions LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
- Fed. Cir. · Sept. 11, 2026Caddo Systems, Inc. v. JetBrains Americas, Inc.
- Fed. Cir. · Sept. 11, 2026WIPQTUS, INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.