CAFC-DCTOctober 13, 2026·25-1835
BRIGHTEX BIO-PHOTONICS, LLC v. L'OREAL USA, INC.
District Court
Holding
Our summary of this decision is on its way. The full opinion is linked below.
Why It Matters
Review the linked PDF before publication. The extracted conclusion below is included for audit.
Key Points
- on is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BRIGHTEX BIO-PHOTONICS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. L'OREAL USA, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2025-1835 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:24-cv-07919-JCS, Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ HARDEMAN GRANT TUCKER, Diamond McCarthy LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also repre- sented by MICHAEL WILLIAM DOELL, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL JOE, KENNETH PAUL KULA, Buether Joe & Coun- selors, LLC, Dallas, TX; D. SCOTT HEMINGWAY, Hemingway & Hansen, LLP, Dallas, TX. RAMSEY M. AL-SALAM, Ashurst Perkins Coie US LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also [Page 2] Case: 25-1835 Document: 42 Page: 2 Filed: 10/13/2026 represented b
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 13, 2026NOBLE INNOVATIONS NC LLC v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 13, 2026YIELDMO, INC. v. TEADS, INC.
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 8, 2026In re Gonthier
- Fed. Cir. · Sept. 15, 2026ABC IP LLC v. PEAK TACTICAL LLC
- Fed. Cir. · Sept. 15, 2026DODOTS Licensing Solutions LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.