CAFC-DCTJune 30, 2026·26-1756, 26-1914·Proceedings dismissed; mandate issued June 30, 2026.
General Access Solutions, Ltd. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
District Court
Holding
The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal and cross-appeal by agreement of the parties under Rule 42(b). Each side must bear its own costs.
Why It Matters
This is a non-merits stipulated dismissal, so it creates no substantive patent-law ruling for future cases.
Full Summary
General Access Solutions, Ltd. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal and cross-appeal by agreement of the parties under Rule 42(b). Each side must bear its own costs.
This is a non-merits stipulated dismissal, so it creates no substantive patent-law ruling for future cases.
Proceedings dismissed; mandate issued June 30, 2026.
The order is nonprecedential and contains no merits analysis.
Both the appeal and cross-appeal were dismissed under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) based on the parties’ agreement.
The Federal Circuit ordered each side to bear its own costs.
The extracted order does not identify the patents, technology, asserted issues, or district-court rulings being appealed.
non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture
non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture
non-precedential standing / jurisdiction
Key Points
- The order is nonprecedential and contains no merits analysis.
- Both the appeal and cross-appeal were dismissed under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) based on the parties’ agreement.
- The Federal Circuit ordered each side to bear its own costs.
- The extracted order does not identify the patents, technology, asserted issues, or district-court rulings being appealed.
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 8, 2026Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. v. Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 6, 2026Inari Agriculture, Inc. v. Corteva Agriscience LLC
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 6, 2026In re Google LLC
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 5, 2026AlexSam, Inc. v. Simon Property Group, L.P.
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 2, 2026Nomad Goods, Inc. v. Nomad Grill LLC