FULKERSON v. NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
District Court
Holding
The Federal Circuit held that Fulkerson failed to show the appeal fell within the court’s limited district-court appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1295. Rather than dismiss, the court transferred the appeal and all filings to the Tenth Circuit under 28 U.S.C. § 1631.
Why It Matters
The order is a reminder that naming the Federal Circuit or referencing MSPB-related history does not create Federal Circuit jurisdiction over a district-court appeal lacking a patent, qualifying PTO-review, or other statutory basis.
Full Summary
Key Points
- The underlying complaint sought damages for alleged constitutional and civil-rights violations tied to litigation involving Fulkerson’s prior Social Security Administration employment.
- Fulkerson invoked 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(9), arguing that his complaint referenced prior MSPB appeals.
- The court explained that this was an appeal from a district-court dismissal, and Fulkerson did not show a basis for Federal Circuit jurisdiction under § 1295.
- The court chose transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1631 rather than dismissal on the merits.
- The order is nonprecedential.
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 1, 2026Truinject Corp. v. Galderma S.A.
- Fed. Cir. · Sept. 30, 2026WSOU Investments LLC v. Salesforce, Inc.
- Fed. Cir. · Sept. 30, 2026ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
- Fed. Cir. · Sept. 30, 2026EPIC TECH, LLC v. PEN-TECH ASSOCIATES, INC.
- Fed. Cir. · Sept. 21, 2026BERKELEY*IEOR v. W.W. Grainger Inc.