Certain Wearable Breast Pumps, Associated Milk Storage Containers, and Components Thereof; Inv. No. 337-TA-1522 (Violation)

This supplemental complaint, filed by Willow Innovations, Inc. and Willow Blossom HoldCo Ltd., modifies a single paragraph (paragraph 167) of the Section 337 complaint originally filed August 20, 2026, and adds new Exhibit 88, a proposed Consent Judgment filed in the Western District of Washington. The supplement bolsters the allegation that Shenzhen TPH Technology Co., Ltd. is properly named as a respondent, by tying it to the accused Momcozy products through its own statements in the district court case. The underlying investigation concerns wearable breast pumps and milk storage containers, and the document itself does not describe the relief sought. Complainants are Willow Innovations, Inc. and Willow Blossom HoldCo Ltd.; the filing is submitted under 19 C.F.R. § 210.12. Paragraph 167 is corrected for a misstatement, including replacing references and adding that Shenzhen Root and Hong Kong Lute are respondents. New sentences state that Shenzhen TPH and others submitted a proposed Consent Judgment calling themselves Momcozy and referring to the S9, S9 Pro, S12, S12 Pro, M5, MobileStyle (M6), and Mobile Flow (M9) products as the Accused Momcozy Products. Exhibit 88 is the proposed Consent Judgment filed June 17, 2026 in W.D. Wash. Case No. 23-631-KKE, Dkt. 168-1. Complainants say the changes do not alter the substance of the complaint as a whole. The certificate of service lists many served entities, including Shenzhen Root, Hong Kong Lute, Shenzhen TPH, and Anker Innovations Limited.