Certain Melanoma Predictive and Prognostic Tests and Components Thereof; Inv. No. 337-TA-3921 (Violation)
U.S. International Trade Commission
Holding
Castle Biosciences filed a non-patent Section 337 complaint against SkylineDx Holding B.V., SkylineDx USA, Qiagen GmbH, and Qiagen LLC alleging Lanham Act false advertising and unfair competition involving SkylineDx’s imported Merlin melanoma predictive/prognostic gene-expression test and Qiagen RNeasy FFPE components used with it. Castle contends respondents falsely market Merlin as superior to Castle’s DecisionDx-Melanoma test and make misleading claims about clinical utility, scientific uniqueness, and physician liability.
Why It Matters
The complaint targets competition in melanoma gene-expression profiling tests used to guide sentinel lymph node biopsy and other cancer-management decisions, where comparative performance claims can influence physicians, payors, and health systems. Castle seeks a limited exclusion order and cease-and-desist orders barring importation, sales, marketing, and distribution of the accused Merlin-related products tied to the alleged unfair acts.
Full Summary
Key Points
- Castle alleges Section 337(a)(1)(A) violations based on false and misleading advertising actionable under Lanham Act Section 43(a), not patent infringement.
- The accused products are SkylineDx’s Merlin melanoma CP-GEP test and imported Qiagen RNeasy FFPE kits/components allegedly used in Merlin testing in the United States.
- Castle asserts a domestic industry based on its U.S. DecisionDx-Melanoma testing operations, laboratories, regulatory approvals, personnel, and investments, and claims threatened injury through lost sales, market share, goodwill, and market value.
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 8, 2026Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. v. Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 6, 2026Inari Agriculture, Inc. v. Corteva Agriscience LLC
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 6, 2026In re Google LLC
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 5, 2026AlexSam, Inc. v. Simon Property Group, L.P.
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 2, 2026Nomad Goods, Inc. v. Nomad Grill LLC