Back to Blog
CAFC-DCTMay 28, 2026·25-1628, 25-1629·Appeals dismissed; mandate issued May 28, 2026.

PANTECH CORPORATION v. ONEPLUS TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD.

District Court

Holding

The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeals by agreement of the parties under Rule 42(b). Each side will bear its own costs.

Why It Matters

This nonprecedential order is a procedural termination only and provides no substantive patent-law guidance.

Full Summary

PANTECH CORPORATION v. ONEPLUS TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD. [ORDER] The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeals by agreement of the parties under Rule 42(b). Each side will bear its own costs. This nonprecedential order is a procedural termination only and provides no substantive patent-law guidance. Appeals dismissed; mandate issued May 28, 2026. The order resolves Federal Circuit appeal Nos. 2025-1628 and 2025-1629 from the Eastern District of Texas. The parties jointly agreed to dismissal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). The court did not address any patent-law merits issues, including infringement, validity, or claim construction. Each side bears its own costs, and the order issued as the mandate on the same date. non-precedential waiver / forfeiture standing / jurisdiction claim construction infringement non-precedential waiver / forfeiture standing / jurisdiction claim construction infringement non-precedential waiver / forfeiture

Key Points

  • The order resolves Federal Circuit appeal Nos. 2025-1628 and 2025-1629 from the Eastern District of Texas.
  • The parties jointly agreed to dismissal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b).
  • The court did not address any patent-law merits issues, including infringement, validity, or claim construction.
  • Each side bears its own costs, and the order issued as the mandate on the same date.
non-precedentialwaiver / forfeiturestanding / jurisdictionclaim constructioninfringement

More on this topic