CAFC-ITCJuly 14, 2026·25-2164·Motion granted; Appeal No. 2025-2162 deconsolidated and dismissed; mandate issued as to that appeal only; costs taxed against Viking.
ASCLETIS PHARMA INC. v. ITC
International Trade Commission
Holding
The Federal Circuit granted the Commission’s motion to dismiss Viking’s cross-appeal. The court deconsolidated and dismissed Appeal No. 2025-2162, taxed costs against Viking, and left Ascletis’s appeal, No. 2025-2164, to proceed.
Why It Matters
The order is a procedural reminder that unopposed ITC cross-appeals may be dismissed without affecting the remaining merits appeal.
Full Summary
ASCLETIS PHARMA INC. v. ITC [ORDER]
The Federal Circuit granted the Commission’s motion to dismiss Viking’s cross-appeal. The court deconsolidated and dismissed Appeal No. 2025-2162, taxed costs against Viking, and left Ascletis’s appeal, No. 2025-2164, to proceed.
The order is a procedural reminder that unopposed ITC cross-appeals may be dismissed without affecting the remaining merits appeal.
Motion granted; Appeal No. 2025-2162 deconsolidated and dismissed; mandate issued as to that appeal only; costs taxed against Viking.
The order is nonprecedential and addresses only the Commission’s motion to dismiss Viking’s cross-appeal.
The underlying matter is ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1352, but the order does not describe the patents, products, domestic-industry theory, or merits issues.
Viking did not oppose dismissal, although it purported to reserve rights to challenge dismissal in future proceedings.
The Federal Circuit dismissed and deconsolidated Viking’s cross-appeal, taxed costs against Viking, and transmitted the order to the merits panel for Ascletis’s remaining appeal.
non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture
non-precedential standing / jurisdiction waiver / forfeiture
non-precedential standing / jurisdiction
Key Points
The order is nonprecedential and addresses only the Commission’s motion to dismiss Viking’s cross-appeal.
The underlying matter is ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1352, but the order does not describe the patents, products, domestic-industry theory, or merits issues.
Viking did not oppose dismissal, although it purported to reserve rights to challenge dismissal in future proceedings.
The Federal Circuit dismissed and deconsolidated Viking’s cross-appeal, taxed costs against Viking, and transmitted the order to the merits panel for Ascletis’s remaining appeal.
We use essential cookies to run the site, and analytics and Google Ads advertising cookies only if you allow them. We use cookies strictly necessary to run the site (sign-in, payments). With your consent we also use analytics, and Google Ads advertising cookies that record which ad brought you here and let us show our ads to past visitors. You can accept or decline these non-essential cookies. See our Privacy & Cookie Policy.