In re Gomez
Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Holding
The Federal Circuit granted the joint motion to remand after the parties stated that the PTAB relied on a reference that was not prior art in rejecting certain application claims. The order did not address the merits beyond remanding for further consideration.
Why It Matters
This nonprecedential order underscores that a PTAB rejection resting on a non-prior-art reference can warrant a consensual remand without a merits opinion.
Full Summary
Key Points
- The appeal arose from a PTAB decision rejecting claims in Application No. 17/375,841.
- The parties jointly moved to remand, stating that the Board relied on a reference that was not prior art.
- The Federal Circuit granted the motion and remanded for further USPTO consideration consistent with the motion and order.
- The order is nonprecedential and provides no additional analysis on the rejection grounds or the affected claims.
- Fed. Cir. · Sept. 30, 2026In re Medical Components, Inc.
- Fed. Cir. · Sept. 14, 2026NCS Multistage Inc. v. TCO Group AS
- Fed. Cir. · Sept. 14, 2026NCS Multistage Inc. v. Nine Energy Service, Inc.
- PTAB Director Review · Sept. 9, 2026Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. Maxell, Ltd.
- Fed. Cir. · Aug. 10, 2026Dental Monitoring SAS v. Align Technology, Inc.