Back to Blog
CAFC-DCTJune 22, 2026·26-1863·Appeal dismissed; each side to bear its own costs; mandate issued June 22, 2026.

POM GROUP INC. v. SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS

District Court

Holding

The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) based on the parties' agreement. Each side will bear its own costs, and the order issued as the mandate.

Why It Matters

This order reflects only a consensual appellate dismissal and does not address any patent-law merits issue.

Full Summary

POM GROUP INC. v. SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS [ORDER] The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) based on the parties' agreement. Each side will bear its own costs, and the order issued as the mandate. This order reflects only a consensual appellate dismissal and does not address any patent-law merits issue. Appeal dismissed; each side to bear its own costs; mandate issued June 22, 2026. The order is nonprecedential. The appeal came from the Western District of Pennsylvania in No. 2:25-cv-01909-WSS. The Federal Circuit did not reach any merits issue, including infringement, validity, claim construction, or remedies. Dismissal was entered under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) by agreement of the parties. Each side bears its own costs, and the dismissal order issued as the mandate. non-precedential claim construction infringement non-precedential claim construction infringement non-precedential

Key Points

  • The order is nonprecedential.
  • The appeal came from the Western District of Pennsylvania in No. 2:25-cv-01909-WSS.
  • The Federal Circuit did not reach any merits issue, including infringement, validity, claim construction, or remedies.
  • Dismissal was entered under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) by agreement of the parties.
  • Each side bears its own costs, and the dismissal order issued as the mandate.
non-precedentialclaim constructioninfringement

More on this topic