Back to Blog
CAFC-ITCSeptember 18, 2026·26-1638·Appeal dismissed; mandate issued September 18, 2026.

SF Diamond Co., Ltd. v. ITC

International Trade Commission

Holding

The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) based on the parties’ agreement. Each side bears its own costs.

Why It Matters

This order ends the Federal Circuit appeal without any merits ruling on the underlying ITC determination.

Full Summary

SF Diamond Co., Ltd. v. ITC The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) based on the parties’ agreement. Each side bears its own costs. This order ends the Federal Circuit appeal without any merits ruling on the underlying ITC determination. Appeal dismissed; mandate issued September 18, 2026. The order is nonprecedential and contains no substantive discussion of patent or ITC issues. The appeal arose from ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1236. The parties stipulated to dismissal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The Federal Circuit ordered each side to bear its own costs and issued the mandate the same day. non-precedential standing / jurisdiction non-precedential standing / jurisdiction non-precedential standing / jurisdiction

Key Points

  • The order is nonprecedential and contains no substantive discussion of patent or ITC issues.
  • The appeal arose from ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-1236.
  • The parties stipulated to dismissal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).
  • The Federal Circuit ordered each side to bear its own costs and issued the mandate the same day.
non-precedentialstanding / jurisdiction

More on this topic