CAFC-DCTJuly 8, 2026·26-1709·Appeal dismissed; mandate issued July 8, 2026.
Swift Paws, Inc. v. Zhende Tech
District Court
Holding
The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal under Rule 42(b) by agreement of the parties and ordered each side to bear its own costs. The order contains no merits ruling on any patent issue.
Why It Matters
This is a stipulated appellate dismissal with no precedential or substantive patent-law guidance.
Full Summary
Swift Paws, Inc. v. Zhende Tech
The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal under Rule 42(b) by agreement of the parties and ordered each side to bear its own costs. The order contains no merits ruling on any patent issue.
This is a stipulated appellate dismissal with no precedential or substantive patent-law guidance.
Appeal dismissed; mandate issued July 8, 2026.
The order is nonprecedential.
The appeal arose from the Middle District of Florida, but the order does not identify any patent-law issue or merits ruling.
The parties agreed to dismissal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).
Each side bears its own costs.
The Federal Circuit issued the dismissal as the mandate on the same day.
non-precedential waiver / forfeiture standing / jurisdiction
non-precedential waiver / forfeiture standing / jurisdiction
non-precedential waiver / forfeiture standing / jurisdiction
Key Points
- The order is nonprecedential.
- The appeal arose from the Middle District of Florida, but the order does not identify any patent-law issue or merits ruling.
- The parties agreed to dismissal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).
- Each side bears its own costs.
- The Federal Circuit issued the dismissal as the mandate on the same day.
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 8, 2026Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. v. Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 6, 2026Inari Agriculture, Inc. v. Corteva Agriscience LLC
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 6, 2026In re Google LLC
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 5, 2026AlexSam, Inc. v. Simon Property Group, L.P.
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 2, 2026Nomad Goods, Inc. v. Nomad Grill LLC