Certain Convertible Child Highchairs; Inv. No. 337-TA-1510 (Violation)
U.S. International Trade Commission
Holding
This supplemental complaint, filed by Kids2, LLC in Inv. No. 337-TA-1510 on convertible child highchairs, makes corrections to the Public Interest Statement and the Complaint, including counsel information, exhibit numbers, an accused-products claim table, a domestic industry paragraph, and a litigation dismissal date. It also reports that certified USPTO records have not yet been received.
Why It Matters
The filing corrects the record on which the Section 337 investigation proceeds, including which claims of the asserted patents are charted against the accused Graco products. It removes claim 21 of the '053 Patent from the asserted claims and adds a statement about domestic industry products. It does not itself change the relief sought, but the underlying complaint concerns highchairs accused of infringement.
Full Summary
Key Points
- Complainant Kids2, LLC submits the supplement through Foley & Lardner LLP; the respondents are not identified in the metadata, and the text names Graco only through the Accused Graco Products.
- Signature blocks and cover page are corrected to add email addresses, fix a phone number, and change the entity name from Kids2, Inc. to Kids2, LLC.
- Paragraph 5.21 now cites Exhibits 19-23 for the assignments of the Asserted Patents.
- Paragraph 6.14 is revised so the Accused Graco Products table (DuoDiner DLX 6-in-1, Table2Table LX 6-in-1, Table2Table Premier Fold 7-in-1) no longer lists claim 21 of the '053 Patent; the patents listed are the '225, '749, '513, '053 and '006.
- Paragraph 9.7 adds that there are no material differences between the products charted in Exhibit 66 and the other Domestic Industry Products.
- Paragraph 11.3 corrects the dismissal date of the Kids2 v. Dorel Juvenile Group case in D. Mass. to June 4, 2025; certified USPTO records requested April 15, 2026 are still pending and will be supplemented.
Related Documents
New to District court litigation? Start with PTAB vs. District Court: Where to Challenge a Patent’s Validity
- ITC · Oct. 13, 2026Certain Extrusion-Coated Magnet Wire; Inv. No. 337-TA-3940 (Violation)
- ITC · Oct. 12, 2026Certain Foundry Coke; Inv. No. 337-TA-1512 (Violation)
- ITC · Oct. 9, 2026Certain Vertical Power Delivery Systems, Components Thereof, and Computing Systems Containing the Same; Inv. No. 337-TA-1526
- ITC · Oct. 9, 2026Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof I; Inv. No. 337-TA-1451 (Violation)
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 5, 2026O'Reilly Winship LLC v. SnapRays LLC