Taylor v. People of the Venue of the Foreign United States
District Court
Holding
The Federal Circuit held that the appeal did not fall within its limited district-court appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1295. It transferred the matter and all filings to the D.C. Circuit under 28 U.S.C. § 1631.
Why It Matters
The order is a reminder that the Federal Circuit will transfer, rather than decide, district-court appeals that do not arise under the patent laws or another statutory basis for Federal Circuit jurisdiction.
Full Summary
Key Points
- The complaint asserted federal-question and FSIA jurisdiction and sought damages for alleged tort and § 1983 violations; no patent-law issue appears from the order.
- The Federal Circuit identified its relevant district-court jurisdiction as limited to patent-law cases, certain PTO-review civil actions, and specified small damages claims against the United States.
- Plaintiff did not show that the case fit any Federal Circuit jurisdictional category.
- Rather than dismiss, the court transferred the appeal and all filings to the D.C. Circuit under § 1631.
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 1, 2026Truinject Corp. v. Galderma S.A.
- Fed. Cir. · Sept. 30, 2026WSOU Investments LLC v. Salesforce, Inc.
- Fed. Cir. · Sept. 30, 2026ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
- Fed. Cir. · Sept. 30, 2026EPIC TECH, LLC v. PEN-TECH ASSOCIATES, INC.
- Fed. Cir. · Sept. 21, 2026BERKELEY*IEOR v. W.W. Grainger Inc.