Vidstream LLC v. Twitter, Inc.
District Court
Holding
On the parties' agreement, the court dismissed cross-appeal No. 2026-1287 under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), with each side bearing its own costs for that appeal. It also revised the official caption for the remaining appeal, No. 2026-1271. No merits issue was decided.
Why It Matters
This is a housekeeping order with no substantive patent ruling. It shows only that one cross-appeal in the Vidstream/Twitter dispute ended by agreement while the remaining appeal continues.
Full Summary
Key Points
- The order is nonprecedential and was issued on the parties' agreement.
- Cross-appeal 2026-1287 is dismissed under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), and each side bears its own costs for that appeal.
- The revised official caption for the remaining appeal, 2026-1271, is reflected in the order.
- The mandate issued as to 2026-1287 only, on May 18, 2026.
- The order does not describe the patents, claims, issues or district court rulings, and it decides no merits question. The appeals are from the Northern District of Texas.
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 8, 2026Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. v. Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 6, 2026Inari Agriculture, Inc. v. Corteva Agriscience LLC
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 6, 2026In re Google LLC
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 5, 2026AlexSam, Inc. v. Simon Property Group, L.P.
- Fed. Cir. · Oct. 2, 2026Nomad Goods, Inc. v. Nomad Grill LLC